Thursday, May 28th, 2009
The role of technology

Sometimes I hear people complain about things that seem like they should be celebrated.  

 

For instance, people often complain about how technology is replacing traditional jobs in old-school, blue collar areas.  It's true that sometimes machines come in and make workers obsolete, but that doesn't mean they're taking away jobs.  They're just taking cashier and assembly line jobs and converting them into engineering jobs (making and maintaining the robots).  This is obviously a net gain for the country.

 

This is, of course, a pretty obvious and well addressed example, but there are other times when people try to vilify technology when I think it's inappropriate.

 

Several people have expressed their concern to me over the fact that many younger people don't bother to remember phone numbers because of cell phones.  These people seem to think that memorizing random numbers makes a person smarter.

 

I have the exact opposite reaction when I learn that things that were once essential are now completely ignored by younger generations.  The reason people don't remember phone numbers anymore is because people don't have to.  Remembering phone numbers or chemical reactions or trig identities is a waste of brain power in my opinion.

 

It's not that we're taking the focus that older generations applied toward remembering phone numbers and emptying that part of our brains out.  Instead we're replacing it with more useful things (at least some of us are).

 

Ultimately, I think that's the whole point of technology.  If a computer can automate some part of my life, I'm better off.  I don't believe that computers will ever replace humans because as we invent new ways to streamline what we used to spend time doing, we inevitably invent a new way to spend our time which is generally more interesting.

 

This all ties in to how I value the ability to learn new things, but  I have a post coming up all about that, so I'll lay off the topic for now.  I just want everyone to know that I hope to make myself obsolete by the time I turn 30.


Posted by Tyler King
Tags:

This post has 5 Comments

Grouchy old fart
May 29, 2009 at 07:28 am
A person who excels on technology should be able to make themselves obsolete before they are 30.

May 31, 2009 at 09:30 pm
Keep in mind, if there was a 1-to-1 conversion of "laborer" jobs to "robot building/maintenance" jobs, then productivity would not have increased  (unless we're also exporting the robots for profit, but "assuming all else equal..." you have in fact destroyed jobs).  You can believe the job supply is infinite because anyone can be an entrepreneur, but empirical evidence suggests that this is not true for a large chunk of the population (economic output decreases are followed by increases in unemployment).

May 31, 2009 at 09:48 pm
That's definitely true, but part of what I'm assuming (which I should have explained) is that as technology increases, we have the means to provide for ourselves with less work.  Assuming that, we can reduce the amount of work that needs doing without reducing the amount of wealth generated.  So you're right that there is less work to be done, but that doesn't mean there's less money to be earned by Americans.

It's probably niave of me to think like this, but it seems to work in theory at least.

June 1, 2009 at 12:57 pm
I agree that technology in cases like this increases overall wealth. But I think it's important to consider the distribution of that wealth, especially when you ask questions like "why are people complaining?"  If overall wealth increases but unemployment and poverty also steadily increase, you haven't created a recipe for long-term economic success of the society. Eventually you will reach the point of popular revolt, riots, terrorism, etc.

This is basically an argument for some socialism (government-support programs to ease transition of workers displaced by technology -- unemployment training, social security, scholarships and tax breaks for education, etc.). I wouldn't generally use this to argue for artificial protection of out-of-date jobs, but some people would, especially in the short term.

June 1, 2009 at 10:22 pm
Yeah, that's what I meant when I say I'm being naive.  There's also the chance that since I'll likely end up benefiting from this shift of wealth, I could be formulating my opinions based on self-interest.

Leave a comment

Please fill this out to prove you aren't a robot.
You can Create an Account or Log in to hide this.
Name: Required
Email: Required. This will not be shared
Your Website: Optional
Comment:
Email me if other people comment on this post
Receive Email Updates:


About this site
Hi, I'm Tyler King and this is my blog. It's about programming, graphic design, UI design, and anything else related to software development. You can read this post to learn a little bit more about what I'm trying to do here.

If you're interested in learning more about me, check out my Portfolio, Bio or Resume.
Search
Tips
If you have any feedback about the site or you have a topic you'd like me to write about, send an email to tips@TylerKing.net.
Archives
2010 (2)
March (2)
2009 (88)
August (6)
July (17)
June (20)
May (33)
April (12)
Links

More about me:


My friends:


Sites that I really like:


Blog
Portfolio
Resume
Bio
Contact
© 2010 - Tyler King